Nurse Writing Services

NURS FPX 4035 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors




    NURS FPX 4035 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

    NURS FPX 4035 Assessment 3

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX4035 Enhancing Patient Safety and Quality of Care

    Prof. Name

    Date

    Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

    Welcome, everyone. I am ____, and today’s focus is on a crucial patient safety concern: failures during patient handoffs in the Emergency Department (ED). This in-service presentation will equip our team with tools and strategies to streamline handovers, strengthen communication, and ultimately safeguard our patients and enhance clinical outcomes.

    Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes

    The session begins by examining the risks associated with ineffective ED handoffs—risks that include patient harm, diminished care quality, longer hospital stays, higher costs, and even mortality (Nawawi & Ibrahim, 2024). We will introduce evidence-based solutions such as the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) framework and bedside handoff practices. A recent adverse event involving a septic patient, where critical details were lost and documentation was insufficient, underlines the urgency of this initiative.

    Goals

    1. Identify Contributors to ED Handoff Errors We will explore leading causes—limited training, time pressures, interruptions, lack of standardized procedures, system gaps, and staffing shortages. Poor communication during handoffs accounts for about 22.1% of nursing-related adverse events (Kim et al., 2021).
    2. Review Evidence-Based Prevention Strategies We’ll demonstrate how SBAR, bedside handoffs, and optimized use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) templates can reduce errors, improve information accuracy, and boost workflow efficiency (Nawawi & Ibrahim, 2024).
    3. Highlight the Impact and Necessary Competencies Understanding the severe consequences of handoff failures underscores why addressing these gaps is vital. We will conclude with practical skills training to help staff integrate these protocols into routine care and anticipate risks during shift changes.

    Outcomes

    By the session’s end, participants will be able to:

    • Pinpoint root causes of poor ED handoffs and recognize weaknesses in current practices.
    • Employ standardized communication tools to decrease errors, expedite information transfer, and ensure complete documentation.
    • Apply newly learned skills immediately to reduce handoff-related incidents, thereby elevating care standards and patient safety (Nawawi & Ibrahim, 2024).

    Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan

    Overview of the Patient Handoff Issue

    Inaccurate or incomplete ED handoffs are a persistent safety threat, leading to patient injury, lower care standards, extended stays, rising costs, and fatalities (Nawawi & Ibrahim, 2024). Communication failures contribute to 40.2% of adverse events and up to 80.1% of medical errors, representing an annual U.S. cost of roughly \$12.1 billion (Janagama et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021).

    Process for Safety Improvement

    1. Adopt SBAR as the uniform handoff protocol to structure exchanges and minimize misunderstandings (Kay et al., 2022).
    2. Enhance Monitoring and Alerts to preemptively identify safety threats.
    3. Upgrade Systems by integrating EHR-based handoff templates and the Electronic Nursing Handover System (ENHS) to standardize data transfer and decrease handoff duration (Tataei et al., 2023).
    4. Conduct Regular Training to reinforce protocols, build staff confidence, and sustain adherence (Nawawi & Ibrahim, 2024).

    Implications and Organizational Importance

    Unchecked handoff errors undermine patient safety, inflate costs, and damage institutional reputation. Standardizing handoff procedures will foster teamwork, strengthen compliance with accreditation standards, reduce liability, and improve staff morale by streamlining workflows.

    Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance

    Audience’s Role in Implementation

    Successful handoff improvements require active participation from all care providers—nurses, physicians, and administrators. Frontline staff must apply structured tools during shifts, participate in training, and share feedback. Leadership must allocate resources for electronic tools and education, enabling staff to perform safe, effective transitions.

    Criticality of Audience Engagement

    Without buy-in from clinicians and managers, even the best protocols remain unused. Engaged staff ensure accurate data transfer, support continuous refinement of processes, and cultivate a culture of shared responsibility for patient safety (Tataei et al., 2023).

    Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice

    New Processes and Skills

    • SBAR Framework: A step-by-step approach to convey essential patient information clearly (Kay et al., 2022).
    • EHR Handoff Templates & ENHS: Digital tools that standardize reporting formats, minimize omissions, and improve patient satisfaction (Abraham et al., 2024).

    Practical Activity

    A simulation exercise will allow small groups to role-play a sepsis patient handoff using SBAR under realistic distractions. Facilitator feedback will highlight communication gaps and reinforce best practices. A Q\&A session will prompt discussion on verifying critical details and leveraging EHR tools to prevent errors.

    Part 5: Soliciting Feedback

    We will distribute anonymous surveys featuring Likert-scale and open-ended questions to assess the session’s clarity, tool usability, and training effectiveness. Feedback will be systematically analyzed to identify trends and guide continuous improvement (Maassen et al., 2024).

    Conclusion

    Improving ED handoffs is essential for patient safety. This in-service equips staff with structured communication frameworks and digital tools to reduce handoff errors. Ongoing training, leadership support, and collective engagement will ensure sustainable practice changes and better patient outcomes.

    NURS FPX 4035 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

    SectionKey Points
    Improvement Plan In-Service PresentationIntroduction to the session’s objective: enhancing ED handoff safety and outcomes through better communication practices.
    Part 1: Agenda and OutcomesOverview of handoff risks; fatal incident example; introduction of SBAR and bedside protocols; expected learning objectives.
    Goals1. Analyze causes of handoff errors
    2. Explore evidence-based prevention methods
    3. Emphasize importance and develop practical skills
    OutcomesAbility to identify process flaws; implement standardized tools; apply new skills to reduce errors and enhance patient safety.
    Part 2: Safety Improvement PlanOverview of handoff inefficiencies and statistics
    Process steps: SBAR adoption, monitoring, system upgrades, training
    Implications for patient safety, costs, reputation, and staff morale
    Part 3: Audience’s Role and ImportanceRoles of frontline staff and leadership in adopting protocols; necessity of stakeholder engagement for lasting change.
    Part 4: New Process and Skills PracticeAdoption of SBAR and EHR/ENHS tools; simulation-based learning with sepsis case; collaborative Q\&A to reinforce concepts.
    Part 5: Soliciting FeedbackUse of anonymous surveys and open-ended feedback; analysis to drive iterative improvements.
    ConclusionSummary of benefits: structured communication, digital support tools, ongoing training, and collective effort to enhance ED handoffs and patient safety.

    References

    Abraham, J., King, C. R., Pedamallu, L., Light, M., & Henrichs, B. (2024). Effect of standardized EHR-integrated handoff report on intraoperative communication outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(10), 2356–2368. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae204

    Janagama, S. R., Strehlow, M., Gimkala, A., Rao, G. V. R., Matheson, L., Mahadevan, S., & Newberry, J. A. (2020). Critical communication: A cross-sectional study of signout at the prehospital and hospital interface. Cureus, 12(2), e7114. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7114

    Kay, S., Unroe, K. T., Lieb, K. M., Kaehr, E. W., Blackburn, J., Stump, T. E., Evans, R., Klepfer, S., & Carnahan, J. L. (2022). Improving communication in nursing homes using plan-do-study-act cycles of an SBAR training program. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 42(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221131469

    Kim, J. H., Lee, J. L., & Kim, E. M. (2021). Patient safety culture and handoff evaluation of nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 8(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.12.007

    Maassen, S. M., Bentvelzen, L. S. V., Marie, A., Vermeulen, H., & Oostveen, V. (2024). Systematic RADaR analysis of responses to the open-ended question in the culture of care barometer survey of a Dutch hospital. BMJ Open, 14(4), e082418. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082418

    Nawawi, M. H. M., & Ibrahim, M. I. (2024). Nurses’ perceptions of patient handoffs and predictors of patient handoff perceptions in tertiary care hospitals in Kelantan, Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 14(8), e087612. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087612

    NURS FPX 4035 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

    Tataei, A., Rahimi, B., Afshar, H. L., Alinejad, V., Jafarizadeh, H., & Parizad, N. (2023). The effects of electronic nursing handover on patient safety in general (non-COVID-19) and COVID-19 intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 527. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09502-8