Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 6107 Curriculum Design, Development, and Evaluation
Prof. Name
Date
Curriculum Overview, Framework, and Analysis
This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing (ABSN) program at Duke University School of Nursing. The program is specifically structured for individuals who already hold a bachelor’s degree in another discipline and seek to transition into professional nursing. It addresses the growing global demand for competent nurses by integrating academic rigor with clinical preparedness. The analysis examines the program’s mission, curricular organization, alignment with professional standards, and expected student outcomes. Additionally, it evaluates the theoretical foundations, structural design, and opportunities for curricular enhancement to ensure relevance in a rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.
Context, Learner Population, and the Importance of the Program
Duke University School of Nursing is widely recognized for excellence in nursing education, research, and clinical practice. Its ABSN program is an intensive 16-month pathway comprising 58 credit hours, including elective coursework. The curriculum blends theoretical instruction with clinical practice, preparing graduates to deliver safe, evidence-based care across diverse healthcare settings (Duke University School of Nursing, n.d.-a).
The target learner population consists primarily of adult students who bring diverse academic and professional backgrounds. Many are career changers motivated by a desire to contribute meaningfully to patient care. These learners typically demonstrate strong analytical thinking, communication skills, and adaptability (Duke University School of Nursing, n.d.-b).
What is the significance of the ABSN program in today’s healthcare environment?
The program plays a critical role in addressing the ongoing nursing shortage in the United States. By accelerating the preparation of qualified nurses, it helps meet workforce demands while maintaining high standards of patient care. Furthermore, the curriculum emphasizes leadership, adaptability, and evidence-based practice, which are essential for navigating complex healthcare systems.
Mission, Course Explanations, and Critical Analysis
The mission of Duke University School of Nursing centers on advancing health equity and social justice through education, research, and clinical excellence. It emphasizes leadership development and the generation of knowledge that improves healthcare outcomes globally (Duke University School of Nursing, n.d.-b).
The ABSN curriculum spans four semesters and incorporates a combination of online, in-person, and hybrid learning modalities. It focuses on foundational nursing knowledge, clinical leadership, and healthcare technology. Core areas include health assessment, pharmacology, pathophysiology, and population health. Students must complete 58 credit hours, including six elective credits that allow for academic exploration (Duke University School of Nursing, n.d.-c).
What are the strengths and limitations of the curriculum?
| Aspect | Strengths | Areas for Improvement |
|---|---|---|
| Curriculum Design | Strong emphasis on evidence-based practice and patient-centered care | Limited integration of emerging technologies such as AI and telehealth |
| Flexibility | Inclusion of electives for specialization | Could expand interdisciplinary learning opportunities |
| Skill Development | Focus on leadership and teamwork | Needs greater emphasis on conflict resolution and advanced communication |
| Research Integration | Encourages evidence-based practice | Early introduction of research methods could be strengthened |
Overall, while the curriculum is robust, incorporating advanced technologies and strengthening communication competencies would further enhance its effectiveness.
Professional Standards, Guidelines, and Competencies
The ABSN program aligns with major professional and accreditation standards to ensure quality and credibility. It is accredited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE), ensuring adherence to national benchmarks (Duke University School of Nursing, n.d.-d).
Additionally, the curriculum is guided by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials, which define expected competencies in areas such as leadership, population health, and clinical practice (AACN, 2021). The program also integrates Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies, including patient-centered care, teamwork, safety, and informatics.
How are competencies integrated into the curriculum?
| Competency Framework | Application in Program |
|---|---|
| AACN Essentials | Leadership development, population health, and clinical expertise |
| QSEN Competencies | Safety, teamwork, informatics, and quality improvement |
| Clinical Practice Standards | Simulation, interprofessional collaboration, and hands-on clinical training |
This alignment ensures that graduates are prepared to deliver high-quality, safe, and collaborative care.
Program Learning Outcomes and Professional Standards/Competencies
The ABSN program defines clear learning outcomes that align with professional standards:
What are the expected outcomes of the program?
| Learning Outcome | Description | Aligned Standards |
|---|---|---|
| Scholarly Development | Ability to analyze and apply research findings | AACN Essentials |
| Nursing Identity and Integrity | Professionalism and ethical practice | AACN, QSEN |
| Clinical Judgment | Application of knowledge in patient care | QSEN |
| Interprofessional Teamwork | Effective collaboration across disciplines | AACN |
| Leadership in Care | Coordination and management of care delivery | AACN, QSEN |
| Cultural Sensitivity | Addressing health disparities | AACN, QSEN |
| Data Integration | Use of data to improve outcomes | AACN |
These outcomes collectively ensure that graduates are competent, ethical, and adaptable professionals.
The Process to Update Healthcare Knowledge
Continuous curriculum revision is essential in nursing education. Evidence-based practice (EBP) serves as the foundation for updating healthcare knowledge.
What steps are involved in updating the curriculum?
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Environmental Scanning | Identifying emerging trends, technologies, and patient needs |
| Faculty Collaboration | Integrating new knowledge into coursework |
| Simulation-Based Learning | تعزيز التطبيق العملي للمعرفة |
| Digital Integration | استخدام الموارد الإلكترونية والتحديثات الفورية |
| Feedback Mechanisms | جمع آراء الطلاب وأعضاء هيئة التدريس والممارسين |
This structured process ensures that the curriculum remains current and responsive to healthcare advancements (Cardoso, 2021; Mehdipour–Rabori et al., 2021).
Organizing Design and Theoretical Framework
The ABSN program is grounded in competency-based education (CBE), which emphasizes mastery of skills over time-based progression (Lewis et al., 2022). Students advance by demonstrating proficiency in defined competencies.
The program also incorporates Benner’s Novice to Expert Model, which outlines the progression of clinical expertise from beginner to advanced practitioner (Sterner et al., 2021).
How do these frameworks support learning?
| Framework | Contribution |
|---|---|
| Competency-Based Education | Ensures mastery of essential skills before progression |
| Benner’s Model | Guides development of clinical expertise through experience |
Together, these frameworks promote critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and professional growth.
Historical Overview of Design and Theoretical Model
Competency-based education emerged in the 20th century as a response to the need for performance-based learning. It gained prominence in the 1970s, particularly in healthcare education. Similarly, Benner’s model, introduced in 1984, provided a structured understanding of clinical skill development.
Why are these models still relevant?
They ensure that nursing education prioritizes skill mastery and experiential learning, both of which are essential for patient safety and effective practice.
Significant Concepts of Design and the Model
Key concepts of CBE include competency frameworks, mastery learning, and performance-based assessment. Benner’s model emphasizes experiential learning and clinical judgment.
What is the combined impact of these models?
Their integration enables accelerated yet effective preparation of nurses, ensuring readiness for complex clinical environments while maintaining high standards of care.
Course Development and Influencing Factors
A proposed course, Ethics in Advanced Nursing Practices, would enhance the curriculum by addressing ethical challenges in modern healthcare.
Course Description and Placement
This course focuses on ethical decision-making in complex clinical situations.
Where should the course be placed and why?
It is best positioned in the final semester, allowing students to apply previously acquired clinical knowledge to ethical dilemmas.
Topical Outline and Relationship with Existing Courses
The proposed course complements existing subjects such as pediatrics, adult care, and leadership by integrating ethical reasoning into clinical practice.
Faculty Collaboration
Curriculum development requires collaboration among faculty, clinical experts, and regulatory bodies to ensure academic rigor and practical relevance (Hoare et al., 2024).
Internal Factors Affecting Curriculum Design
Internal influences include institutional priorities, faculty expertise, and curriculum committees, all of which ensure alignment with educational standards.
External Factors Impacting Curriculum Design
External factors include funding, accreditation requirements, and stakeholder expectations, which shape curriculum direction and implementation.
Mission, Philosophy, and Framework
The program’s mission and philosophy emphasize innovation, equity, and evidence-based practice, guiding curriculum design and course development.
Collaboration among Internal and External Stakeholders
Effective collaboration ensures that the curriculum remains relevant, accredited, and aligned with healthcare industry needs.
Curriculum Evaluation
Curriculum evaluation is essential for maintaining quality and relevance in nursing education.
Why is continuous evaluation necessary?
| Reason | Impact |
|---|---|
| Adapting to Change | Keeps curriculum aligned with healthcare advancements |
| Ensuring Competency | Identifies gaps in student learning |
| Accreditation Compliance | Maintains program credibility |
| Faculty Development | Improves teaching effectiveness |
| Stakeholder Satisfaction | Enhances employability of graduates |
Failure to evaluate curricula can result in outdated knowledge, reduced employability, and compromised patient safety (Nunn-Ellison et al., 2023; Chicca & Shellenbarger, 2023).
Criteria for Curriculum Evaluation
Curriculum evaluation in nursing education is a structured and continuous process used to determine whether an academic program remains relevant, effective, and aligned with professional expectations. It serves multiple stakeholders, including students, healthcare employers, and accrediting agencies, by ensuring that graduates are adequately prepared for clinical practice. A robust evaluation framework not only identifies strengths but also highlights gaps requiring revision. Ultimately, these criteria support evidence-informed decision-making and continuous quality improvement in nursing education.
Key Evaluation Criteria Overview
| Criterion | Purpose | Evaluation Focus | Impact on Program |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accreditation Alignment | Ensure compliance with national standards | Regulatory requirements, licensure readiness | Maintains credibility and accreditation status |
| Healthcare Relevance | Address evolving healthcare demands | Emerging technologies, disease trends | Enhances workforce readiness |
| Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) | Measure competency attainment | Critical thinking, clinical judgment | Improves educational effectiveness |
| Stakeholder Feedback | Incorporate diverse perspectives | Input from students, faculty, employers | Supports program refinement |
| Graduate Success Metrics | Evaluate long-term outcomes | Employment, licensure pass rates | Indicates program success |
Alignment with Accreditation Standards
A fundamental requirement of curriculum evaluation is alignment with accreditation standards established by recognized bodies such as the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN). Compliance confirms that the program adheres to nationally recognized benchmarks for quality and prepares graduates for licensure and safe practice (Nunn-Ellison et al., 2023).
Failure to meet these standards can have significant consequences, including loss of accreditation, reduced institutional reputation, and graduates being deemed ineligible for licensure examinations. Therefore, periodic review ensures sustained compliance and institutional credibility.
Relevance to Healthcare Needs
Given the rapidly evolving nature of healthcare, curricula must remain responsive to advancements in technology, treatment modalities, and population health trends. Evaluation should assess whether course content reflects current clinical realities, such as digital health systems, telemedicine, and emerging disease patterns (Al-Omari et al., 2024).
Integrating contemporary topics ensures that graduates are capable of addressing complex patient needs and adapting to modern healthcare environments, thereby improving patient outcomes and system efficiency.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
Clear and measurable Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) are essential for determining whether educational objectives are achieved. Evaluation processes should measure competencies such as analytical reasoning, ethical decision-making, and clinical proficiency.
When students fail to meet expected outcomes, it signals the need for curriculum redesign, instructional modification, or enhanced support mechanisms. Continuous monitoring ensures alignment with professional standards and evolving healthcare expectations.
Stakeholder Feedback
Why is stakeholder feedback important in curriculum evaluation?
Stakeholder feedback provides practical insights into program effectiveness from multiple perspectives, including students, faculty, alumni, and employers.
Regular collection of feedback through surveys, interviews, and focus groups enables educators to identify both strengths and deficiencies. For example, employer input may reveal gaps in clinical preparedness, prompting targeted curriculum enhancements. Ignoring stakeholder perspectives risks perpetuating ineffective educational practices.
Graduate Success Metrics
How is program success measured after graduation?
Graduate success is typically evaluated through indicators such as licensure examination pass rates, employment outcomes, and job satisfaction (Chicca & Shellenbarger, 2023).
These metrics provide longitudinal evidence of program effectiveness and inform accreditation reporting. Declining performance trends necessitate curriculum adjustments to improve graduate competence and employability.
Pilot Testing and Curriculum Evaluation
Pilot testing involves implementing a new or revised curriculum with a limited group before full-scale adoption. This process enables educators to evaluate feasibility, effectiveness, and alignment with learning objectives (Kobiah, 2021).
Pilot Testing Process
| Step | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sample Selection | Choose representative student group | Ensures relevant feedback |
| Implementation | Deliver course content experimentally | Tests feasibility |
| Data Collection | Use surveys, tests, interviews | Identifies strengths and issues |
| Analysis | Evaluate qualitative and quantitative data | Guides revisions |
| Refinement | Modify curriculum accordingly | Improves final design |
Pilot testing minimizes risks associated with large-scale implementation and allows refinement of instructional strategies, learning materials, and assessment methods.
Real-World Example of Pilot Testing
A study by Kovach et al. (2022) demonstrated the effectiveness of pilot testing in developing value-based care training. A selected group of participants completed online modules, followed by structured feedback collection through surveys.
Analysis revealed issues such as content inaccuracies and presentation weaknesses, which were subsequently corrected. This iterative process improved course quality and ensured alignment with learning objectives, highlighting the importance of pilot testing in curriculum development.
Short-term and Long-term Evaluations for Process Improvement
Curriculum evaluation requires both immediate and longitudinal assessment strategies to ensure sustained quality improvement.
Comparison of Evaluation Types
| Evaluation Type | Timeframe | Focus | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term | During or immediately after course | Learning effectiveness, engagement | Quizzes, surveys |
| Long-term | Post-graduation | Career outcomes, professional competence | Employment rates, licensure results |
Process of Short-term Evaluation
Short-term evaluation focuses on immediate feedback regarding teaching effectiveness and student comprehension. Tools such as quizzes, surveys, and classroom observations are commonly used (Murphy et al., 2023).
In the ABSN program, mid-course and end-of-course assessments can measure engagement and understanding. Faculty observations of student participation in case discussions further support real-time instructional adjustments. This iterative process ensures continuous improvement in teaching quality.
Process of Long-term Evaluation
Long-term evaluation examines the sustained impact of education on graduates’ professional performance. Metrics such as licensure pass rates, career progression, and employer feedback are critical indicators (Chicca & Shellenbarger, 2023).
Follow-up surveys conducted 6–12 months post-graduation can assess how effectively coursework supports clinical practice. Additionally, ongoing review of healthcare trends ensures curriculum relevance and alignment with future workforce needs (Stalmeijer et al., 2022).
Evidence-Based Nursing Concepts, Nursing Theories, and Best Practices
Evidence-Based Nursing Concepts
Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates research findings into teaching and clinical decision-making, enhancing educational quality and patient care outcomes (Du et al., 2023).
Key concepts include:
- Patient-centered care: Emphasizes individualized care based on patient preferences.
- Interprofessional collaboration: Promotes teamwork across healthcare disciplines to improve safety and outcomes (Kaiser et al., 2022).
Nursing Theories
Nursing theories provide a conceptual foundation for curriculum design and instructional strategies.
| Theory | Core Concept | Application in Curriculum |
|---|---|---|
| Watson’s Theory of Human Caring | Emphasizes empathy and human connection | Enhances patient-centered care training |
| Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory | Focuses on patient self-care abilities | Guides ethical and clinical decision-making |
These theories support the development of critical thinking and holistic care competencies.
Best Practices in Curriculum Development
Best practices ensure that nursing curricula remain effective and aligned with professional standards. These include:
- Active learning strategies (simulation, case-based learning)
- Blended learning approaches
- Interprofessional education (IPE)
- Continuous feedback mechanisms
Research indicates that such strategies improve clinical reasoning and student engagement (Kalu et al., 2023).
Accreditation Body and Its Evaluation Criteria
The Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) plays a central role in ensuring program quality. Its evaluation framework includes multiple domains:
ACEN Evaluation Criteria
| Criterion | Description |
|---|---|
| Mission and Administration | Alignment with institutional goals |
| Student Outcomes | Achievement of learning objectives |
| Curriculum | Relevance and instructional quality |
| Resources | Availability of faculty and facilities |
| Evaluation Systems | Continuous quality improvement processes |
| Faculty | Qualifications and professional development |
Evaluation outcomes guide program improvements, such as curriculum redesign, faculty training, and enhanced student support services.
Conclusion
Curriculum evaluation in nursing education is a multidimensional process that integrates accreditation standards, stakeholder input, and outcome-based metrics. Both short-term and long-term assessments are essential for maintaining program quality and responsiveness to healthcare advancements.
Pilot testing, evidence-based practices, and theoretical frameworks further strengthen curriculum design and implementation. Accreditation bodies such as ACEN provide structured guidelines that ensure consistency and excellence in nursing education.
By systematically applying these principles, nursing programs can produce competent, adaptable, and ethically grounded professionals capable of meeting the demands of modern healthcare systems.
References
AACN (2021). The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education (pp. 1–82). American Association of Colleges of Nursing. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf
Al-Omari, E., Dorri, R., Blanco, M., & Al-Hassan, M. (2024). Innovative curriculum development: Embracing the concept-based approach in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.018
American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Ethics and human rights. American Nurses Association. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/
Andersson, H., Svensson, A., Frank, C., Rantala, A., Holmberg, M., & Bremer, A. (2022). Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: An integrative systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00766-z
Bagheri, S., Zarshenas, L., Rakhshan, M., Sharif, F., Sarani, E. M., Shirazi, Z. H., & Sitzman, K. (2023). Impact of Watson’s human caring-based health promotion program on caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09725-9
NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation
Cardoso, D. (2021). The effectiveness of an evidence-based practice (EBP) educational program on undergraduate nursing students’ EBP knowledge and skills: A cluster randomized control trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010293
Chicca, J., & Shellenbarger, T. (2023). A roadmap for improving nursing program outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.04.018
Dolansky, M. A., Dick, T., Byrd, E., Miltner, R. S., & Layton, S. S. (2024). The QSEN competency legacy threaded through the entry-level AACN essentials: Shaping the future. Nurse Educator, 49(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001511
Du, S., Jin, S., Zhang, H., Chen, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Incorporating evidence-based practice education in nursing research curriculum of undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice, 70, 103671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103671
Duke University School of Nursing. (n.d.-a). Educational excellence. Duke University School of Nursing. https://nursing.duke.edu/why-duke/educational-excellence
Duke University School of Nursing. (n.d.-b). Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing student handbook 2024-202. Duke University School of Nursing. https://nursing.duke.edu/sites/default/files/documents/ABSN%20Student%20Handbook%202024-2025.pdf
Duke University School of Nursing. (n.d.-c). Academic programs curricula. Duke University School of Nursing. https://nursing.duke.edu/academic-programs/curriculum#absn
Duke University School of Nursing. (n.d.-d). Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing student resources. Duke University School of Nursing. https://nursing.duke.edu/student-resources/absn
Hellqvist, C. (2021). Promoting self-care in nursing encounters with persons affected by long-term conditions—a proposed model to guide clinical care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052223
Hoare, A., Hondzel, C. D., Wagner, S. L., & Church, S. M. (2024). A course-based approach to conducting program review. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00085-4
NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation
Kaiser, L., Conrad, S., Neugebauer, E. A. M., Pietsch, B., & Pieper, D. (2022). Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes in inpatient care: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02027-x
Kalu, F., Wolsey, C., & Enghiad, P. (2023). Undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of active learning strategies: A focus group study. Nurse Education Today, 131, 105986–105986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105986
Kobiah, L. K. (2021). Piloting a new curriculum: Teachers’ perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(4), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i4/11709
Kovach, J., Obanua, F., & Hutchins, H. (2022). Pilot testing a series of value-based care training courses. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13, 319–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s36002
Lewis, L. S., Rebeschi, L. M., & Hunt, E. (2022). Nursing education practice update 2022: Competency-Based education in nursing. SAGE Open Nursing, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221140774
Mehdipour –Rabori, R., Bagherian, B., & Nematollahi, M. (2021). Simulation-based mastery improves nursing skills in BSc nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00532-9
Murphy, D. H., Little, J. L., & Bjork, E. L. (2023). The value of using tests in education as tools for learning—not just for assessment. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09808-3
Nunn- Ellison, K., Tillson, M., Ard, N., & Farmer, S. (2023). Assessment and evaluation: Nursing education and ACEN accreditation. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.06.009
NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation
Purabdollah, M., Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Valizadeh, L., Mousavi, S., & Ghasempour, M. (2023). Competencies expected of undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review. Nursing Open, 10(12), 7487–7508. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2020
Stalmeijer, R. E., Whittingham, J. R. D., Bendermacher, G. W. G., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & Sehlbach, C. (2022). Continuous enhancement of educational quality – fostering a quality culture: AMEE Guide No. 147. Medical Teacher, 45(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2022.2057285
Sterner, A., Ramstrand, N., Palmér, L., & Hagiwara, M. A. (2021). A study of factors that predict novice nurses’ perceived ability to provide care in acute situations. Nursing Open, 8(4), 1958–1969. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.871
Tavakol, N., Molazem, Z., Rakhshan, M., & Asemani, O. (2023). An educational program of reducing moral distress (PRMD) in nurses; designing and evaluating. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04445-4
Ullah, H., Huma, S., Yasin, G., Ashraf, M., Tahir-ud-Din, Q., Shabana, H., & Sarfraz, J. (2024). Curriculum and program evaluation in medical education – A short systematic literature review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 86(10). https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002518
Wangpitipanit, S., Lininger, J., & Anderson, N. (2024). Exploring the deep learning of artificial intelligence in nursing: A concept analysis with Walker and Avant’s approach. BMC Nursing, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02170-x